Design Quality Engineer

Katalyst Pro

📍Minneapolis, MN
Posted May 19, 2026

Job Overview

Position

Design Quality Engineer

Company

Katalyst Pro

Location

Minneapolis, MN

Work Type

On-site

Job ID

li-4415787883

Job Description

The Design Quality Engineer (DQE) at Philips is responsible for ensuring that products are designed and developed in compliance with regulatory standards, quality requirements, and customer expectations. This role works closely with R&D, regulatory, manufacturing, and suppliers to embed quality into product design.

Design Control

  • Ensure compliance with Design Control requirements (21 CFR Part 820 / ISO 13485) throughout product lifecycle

  • Participate in design planning, design reviews, and design verification/validation activities. (cross-functional design reviews, ensuring closure of action items)

  • Review and approve design inputs, outputs, and technical documentation.

  • Support traceability matrix (DHF, DMR, DHR) creation and maintenance.

  • Ensure Design Verification & Validation (V&V) activities meet requirements

  • Review and approval, Engineering Change requests/Orders (ECR/ECOs).

  • Ensure design changes follow proper change control processes.

  • Builds and nurtures effective relationships with internal and external stakeholders, providing expert guidance and mentorship to cross-functional teams, ensuring alignment with quality standards and successful project milestones.

  • Validates critical design inputs such as usability, reliability, performance, manufacturability, and safety, ensuring alignment with both quality standards and regulatory requirements.

  • Design transfer to manufacturing, ensuring process readiness

 

Risk Management Support

  • Guide comprehensive risk management activities throughout the product lifecycle to ensure risks are identified and mitigated

  • Facilitate FMEA (Design and Process) and hazard analysis.

  • Ensure risk controls are implemented, verified, and documented.

QMS Support (Audit, CAPA)

  • Ensure preparation for quality audits and inspections, maintaining documentation to demonstrate compliance

  • Record, manage, and execute CAPA processes including root cause analysis and implementation of solutions

  • Contributes to the development, implementation, and revision of QMS processes

 

Minimum required Experience:

  • Knowledge of medical device regulations, requirements, and standards, such as 21 CFR Parts 820, ISO 13485, ISO 14971, European Medical Device Directive (93/42/EEC), EU Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR), Canadian Medical Devices Regulation (SOR/98-282), etc.

  • Change Management (Including design and Manufacturing transfer)

  • Minimum of 5+ years’ experience in FDA regulated medical device environments, with a focus on Design Assurance/Control, detailed knowledge of Risk

  • You have detailed experience in identifying, promoting, and supporting processes and design quality tools for use in tracking/preventing product defects, design traceability, and Design for Reliability.

Minimum required Education:

  • Bachelor’s degree in medical sciences, Healthcare Management, Industrial Engineering, Supply Chain Management or equivalent.

Interview Prep

AI-powered insights to help you prepare

Key Skills

Required:
Preferred:

Practice Questions

💡Technical Questions (3)
  • 1.Can you walk me through how you ensure compliance with Design Control requirements during the transition from design inputs to design outputs?
  • 2.How do you approach facilitating an FMEA (Design or Process) with a cross-functional team to ensure risks are effectively identified and mitigated?
  • 3.Describe your process for executing a CAPA, specifically focusing on the root cause analysis phase in an FDA-regulated environment.
🎯Behavioral Questions (3)
  • 1.Tell me about a time when you had to push back on an R&D team regarding a design change that did not follow proper change control processes.
  • 2.Give an example of a time you had to validate critical design inputs like usability or manufacturability that were initially poorly defined.
  • 3.Describe a situation where you had to prepare for a challenging quality audit. How did you ensure documentation like the DHF was inspection-ready?
🧩Situational Questions (2)
  • 1.You are approaching the design transfer to manufacturing, but the manufacturing team indicates they are not ready and the process validation is incomplete. However, project management is pushing to stay on schedule. What do you do?
  • 2.During a design review, you notice that the risk management file has not been updated to reflect a recent engineering change, and the traceability matrix is broken. The team views this as administrative paperwork that can be updated later. How do you handle this?

Resume Keywords

Make sure these keywords appear on your resume

Design ControlISO 1348521 CFR Part 820Risk ManagementISO 14971FMEADesign Verification & ValidationCAPADHFDesign TransferEU MDRRoot Cause Analysis

Interested in this position? Apply directly on LinkedIn.

Apply on LinkedIn →